Average for workers who did not work from home.
PLACE · ID · GEOID 16289902024 5-YEAR
COMMUTE PROFILE
Fruitland, Idaho
Mean one-way trip19.0 min±3.6 min MOE
Worked from home8.4%±5.2 pp MOE
Drove alone80.6%±6.3 pp MOE
60+ minute trip4.4%among commuters
U.S. Census Bureau ACS estimates for residents age 16+ who work. Commute time excludes people working from home.
01 / THE SHIFT
What changed in the published estimate?
These periods overlap: 2021 covers 2017–2021 and 2024 covers 2020–2024. Changes are directional comparisons, not independent annual measurements.
Share of workers age 16+ who usually worked from home.
Public transportation excluding taxi.
Car, truck, or van—drove alone.
02 / MODE SHARE
How residents usually get to work
Each share uses 2,846 estimated workers as its denominator. Categories shown here do not include every ACS mode.
03 / PEER CONTEXT
Compared with similar-size places
Percentiles are single-metric context, never a “good commute” score.
Mean commute time is lower than about 84% of covered places in the under 25k population band.
The work-from-home share is lower than about 67% of covered places in the under 25k population band.
The public-transit share is lower than about 82% of covered places in the under 25k population band.
The 60+ minute share is lower than about 70% of covered places in the under 25k population band.
04 / ESTIMATE BASE
The counts behind the shares
Population estimate6,663± 28 MOE
Workers age 16+2,846± 282 MOE
Workers with travel time2,606± 287 MOE
Estimated home workers240± 149 MOE
Why the ± matters
ACS values are survey estimates. The margin of error is the 90% confidence interval published by the Census Bureau or calculated for a share from published component margins. Small differences can be sampling noise.
05 / SAME STATE
All Idaho reports →