Average for workers who did not work from home.
PLACE · WI · GEOID 55468502024 5-YEAR
COMMUTE PROFILE
McFarland, Wisconsin
Mean one-way trip18.9 min±2.9 min MOE
Worked from home21.6%±4.0 pp MOE
Drove alone73.8%±4.6 pp MOE
60+ minute trip2.0%among commuters
U.S. Census Bureau ACS estimates for residents age 16+ who work. Commute time excludes people working from home.
01 / THE SHIFT
What changed in the published estimate?
These periods overlap: 2021 covers 2017–2021 and 2024 covers 2020–2024. Changes are directional comparisons, not independent annual measurements.
Share of workers age 16+ who usually worked from home.
Public transportation excluding taxi.
Car, truck, or van—drove alone.
02 / MODE SHARE
How residents usually get to work
Each share uses 5,084 estimated workers as its denominator. Categories shown here do not include every ACS mode.
03 / PEER CONTEXT
Compared with similar-size places
Percentiles are single-metric context, never a “good commute” score.
Mean commute time is lower than about 84% of covered places in the under 25k population band.
The work-from-home share is higher than about 83% of covered places in the under 25k population band.
The public-transit share is lower than about 82% of covered places in the under 25k population band.
The 60+ minute share is lower than about 92% of covered places in the under 25k population band.
04 / ESTIMATE BASE
The counts behind the shares
Population estimate9,160± 31 MOE
Workers age 16+5,084± 267 MOE
Workers with travel time3,984± 324 MOE
Estimated home workers1,100± 213 MOE
Why the ± matters
ACS values are survey estimates. The margin of error is the 90% confidence interval published by the Census Bureau or calculated for a share from published component margins. Small differences can be sampling noise.
05 / SAME STATE
All Wisconsin reports →